Vincent K Blair Insurance Blog RSS

Unintended consequences of Healthcare reform

Thursday, August 26, 2010
This is a  good TIME magazine article on some unpleasant consequences of the new healthcare reform law.  To summarize, independent brokers and agents, as well as many small insurers, could be forced out of business when the full brunt of the law comes into effect in 2014.

Is this the start of the Death Panels?

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

The FDA is considering revoking its approval of the drug Avastin for use on women with advanced breast cancer.  True, the drug may only extend life by a few months but the precedent is disturbing, as this article from a British newspaper points out. Will the FDA become the 'death panel' detractors of the healthcare law warned us about?

Prop C sends loud message

Thursday, August 05, 2010
Missouri voters spoke loudly and clearly August 3 when 71% of them voted for Proposition C, a state law which prohibits the government from requiring people to have health insurance or from penalizing them from paying for their own health care.

While several state legislatures have passed similar laws contesting the healthcare law's mandate to buy health insurance or else, and Virginia's attorney general has filed suit against it in that state, Missouri was the first state to put the question to the people.  It seems the battle over healthcare reform is far from over... it's just moved from the Congress to the courts.

State Farm is 'subcontracting' out your health insurance

Friday, July 30, 2010
If you are thinking about buying State Farm health insurance, you might want to take a look at this webpage on our site.

State Farm is actually just a reseller of insurance from Assurant, based in Milwaukee.  Nothing wrong with that -- I sell Assurant too, but I'm upfront with people about ALL their choices. l

United Healthcare, Assurant Dropping Child Only Coverage

Friday, July 16, 2010

While politicians, pundits and just plain regular folks continue to debate  whether the new healthcare law will be good or bad for America, two large health insurance companies - United Healthcare and Assurant Health - have already rendered a verdict on at least one portion of the new law:  the part which guarantees coverage to children with pre-existing health conditions, scheduled to be implemented in September 2010.

Their decision? To exit the business of offering "child-only" health insurance altogether. Instead, the two health insurance giants will only insure children if their parents are current customers or Mom and Dad are buying health insurance as well.

While many will be quick to attribute the move to greedy health insurance companies abdicating their responsibility to protect America's kids, it's a matter of simple economics. Although there is still much that is murky about the way the new law will be implemented, I can imagine some absurd scenarios. For example, under the new system, i.e. guaranteed coverage for pre-existing conditions, a social worker at St. Louis Children's Hospital can simply start handing out insurance applications to the parents of patients. The parents of a child with cancer, for example, whose bills might run tens of thousands of dollars a month, would be able to start paying premiums for,say,  $125-200/mo. -- with the insurance company responsible for paying the difference.

Obviously I feel for the child with cancer, but that's not insurance anymore -- that's a social welfare program which has been shifted to the insurance companies.

Exasperating the situation is the recently-signed Missouri law which mandates that health insurance companies pay as much as $40,000 a year per child for autism treatments.

While the intent of the legislation was to bring down healthcare costs, I fear many people will see their health insurance premiums actually rise in the months ahead as these companies scramble to cover their losses insuring kids with pre-existing conditions. Other companies may follow the example of United and Assurant and simply stop offering coverage for children.

I know there is a problem with health insurance in this country but forcing the insurance companies to bear the burden by themselves is not the answer. This is just a taste of what 2014 will bring.

On January 1, 2014, the new healthcare law mandates coverage by health insurance companies of any person with any pre-existing condition, if they are not already covered by Medicaid or Medicare.


Only 36% approve of the new healthcare reform

Wednesday, July 14, 2010
CBS news has published a new poll that shows only 36% of Americans think the new health care law is a good idea. 
(49% disapprove the plan; 15% have no opinion.) 

Furthermore, by a 2-1 margin, Americans believe the new law will hurt them (33%), while 48% say it will have no effect. Only 13% believe it will help them. 

More ominous signs employers may drop coverage...

Friday, June 11, 2010
There is more evidence that employers are getting increasingly nervous about changes that will be forced on their health insurance plans by the new health care law. Many are worried new regulations, which are being written now by the Department of Health and Human Services, will raise their health insurance premiums to the point where it would be cheaper just to pay the new penalty for companies that don't offer health insurance to their employees. Read this article for more information about why the new health care law might actually INCREASE the costs of health care in this country.

Canadian Healthcare system on shaky ground

Tuesday, June 01, 2010
The government-funded "free" healthcare system in Canada is often held up as a model for other countries to follow. But it seems like the model is showing signs of aging. What's the problem? Graying baby-boomers are starting to use more and more of the system's services, putting a huge strain on resources and threatening its very existence in its current form.  Some provinces are being forced to take drastic action -- like requiring co-pays for doctor visits!  Read more about the Canadian health care crisis in this enlightening article.

Health Savings Accounts

Friday, May 14, 2010

There's not a whole lot positive about the new health care bill but one really great health insurance option- Health Savings Accounts - managed to survive the legislative process. And thank goodness: HSA's are an excellent way to save on your taxes when you spend money on your healthcare.  By allowing you to deposit tax-deductible funds into an account that you can use to cover medical costs, HSAs enable you to take control of your own health care decisions and save money at the same time.

But HSAs are not a "stand-alone" solution: first you must have a high-deductible health insurance plan that qualifies to be partnered with an HSA.  These plans are available through various insurance companies. The plans are all similar in the fact that they have deductibles between $1,200 and $5,950 for singles, and between $2,400 and $11,900 for families. 

Want an endorsement?  I have an HSA myself -- that's how much I believe in them.

Read this excellent article in the NY Times for a good summary of how HSA's work.

Uh-oh... Employers are thinking of dropping their health insurance plans!

Thursday, May 06, 2010
During the healthcare debate, critics predicted that employers would drop their group health insurance plans and simply pay the penalty the new law laid out under the reasoning that it would save them boat-loads of money.  Seems big employers like John Deere and ATT are considering doing just that. Click here to read a Fortune Magazine article about this frightening development that will send healthcare costs soaring...

Call Our Office
Get a Free Quote
BBB MemberVincent K. Blair Agency
20 N. Gore, Ste 100
Webster Groves, MO 63119
Tel (314) 961-7777
 (800) 738-4623
Fax (314) 961-7373